South Australian Ad Equates Youngsters’ Gaming with Future Gambling Problems

Some state this new ‘gaming equals gambling’ ad by the SA government goes too far

Put away that new Xbox One or PS4 it just might turn you in to a compulsive gambler. That will not need been the message that the Southern Australian Government was shooting for when they created their latest anti-gambling campaign, but it’s the one that many gamers from Australia and around the world are taking away from it, especially given that state’s previous stances that were seen as anti-gamer.

Gambling Is No Game

The new campaign is called Gambling is No Game, and based on what the SA Government has said in yesteryear, it seemingly have a fairly well-intentioned meaning behind it. The idea is that children who play games that include gambling elements like slots or poker games may become more prone to take up gambling habits later in life, or develop gambling problems even in their adolescence.

But the last product offers a slightly various message. An image of the poster from the campaign was spread over the Internet this showing a girl looking at an iPad while sitting at what appears to be a poker table, complete with chips and cards week. Above her there is a message that is ominous ‘Gambling starts with games.’

The poster immediately sent gamers around the world into an uproar, as it seems to be connecting gaming in general to problem gambling while the idea might be to specifically target games with gambling content.

‘we want to express we’re surprised at this type of hype from Southern Australia, but it’s regrettably more of the same unsubstantiated moral panic that we’ve become used to,’ stated Ron Curry, CEO associated with Interactive Games and Entertainment Association.

Strict, Stricter, Strictest

That may appear to be an overreaction if it had beenn’t for previous actions by the SA Government. For example, Southern Australia was one of the major holdouts in including a classification that is r18 video and computer games in Australia. Past to the classification, the rating that is highest available for games was MA15+; any game that could have been rated R18+ was affectively banned from purchase, since it was ‘Refused Classification.’ The classification that is new eventually agreed in by every state attorney general, and the R18+ classification had been introduced during the start of 2013, that has greatly reduced the amount of banned games in Australia.

South Australia still maintains their own Classification Council that can rate games independently accessible in the state. That plays a essential part in the newest campaign, due to the fact SA government intends to introduce regulations that will need games with simulated gambling content to be classified as MA15+ (or potentially other regulated classifications). This could affect a surprisingly lot of games, as even unassuming games like some within the Pokemon series have featured in-game slot machines. MA15+ games can’t be bought or played by those under the age of 15 without the direction of a moms and dad or guardian.

These aren’t the only steps being taken by the South Australian government as part of their kids, Technology and Gambling policy. Other initiatives range from the creation of a Watch List that will inform parents about games and apps that have gambling content, an increased exposure of teaching ‘cyber safety’ in schools, and a push to have simulated gambling be used as a factor in rating classifications during the level that is federal.

Massachusetts Gaming Commission Okays Revere Vote While Caesars Sues

In the latest episode of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission hearings, Revere gets a shot and Caesars sues a part

Suffolk Downs may well have their modified casino plan approved by Revere voters nevertheless the continuing state of Massachusetts isn’t using their word for this. The gambling commission announced this week they’re ready to allow a Revere-only form of the Suffolk Downs casino plan to go forward, but as long as race track/partner Mohegan Sun is willing to enable Revere to vote again this time on the new proposal.

New Hope for Suffolk Downs

That decision is largely a win for Suffolk Downs, which saw its hopes of an East Boston casino dashed on November 5. Voters there soundly rejected their casino proposition, which would experienced all of the buildings that are major parking facilities situated in Boston. Nonetheless, Revere voters additionally visited the polls that day the proposed casino might have bordered Revere, and some small aspects of the facility could have experienced their city and overwhelmingly authorized the same plan, creating a sticky situation for regulators.

That offered Suffolk Downs the idea of transferring the entire casino to Revere, something Revere seemed rather happy to accommodate. But as many Boston officials argued, which wasn’t what the votes had authorized on election time, and it was not fair to assume which they would be okay with A revere-only casino.

The Massachusetts state gambling payment eventually agreed with this, voting unanimously to permit a referendum that is new be held. Suffolk Downs will have seven days to determine whether or perhaps not to accept this decision, with Suffolk Downs COO Chip Tuttle stating that they will likely achieve this.

Under the proposal that is new Suffolk Downs would act as the landlord regarding the new casino property, while Mohegan Sun would build, very own, and operate the casino it self. The new facility would be independent of this race track, which Suffolk Downs says would continue its current horse-racing operations.

Caesars Sues Commission Chair

Meanwhile, Caesars Entertainment the partner that is original Suffolk Downs has its own group of difficulties with the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. Caesars had been initially anticipated to be the partner for the East Boston casino project, but was dropped by the competition track after state regulators raised concerns over the business’s suitability, predicated on strange allegations of a relationship with another hotel group Gansevoort and a third-party to their dealings who was simply reported to have had dealings with a Russian mob figure.

Now, Caesars has filed a lawsuit against gaming payment chairman Stephen Crosby, stating that he possessed a potential conflict of interest that he failed to disclose in a timely manner. This conflict of great interest, they do say, impacted the objectivity and fairness of the state’s review of their suitability as a gambling operator.

Crosby said earlier this week he made every one of the necessary disclosures about his relationship and former business dealings with a co-owner of land that is designated for use in an Everett casino proposal by Wynn Resorts. Crosby said he would recuse himself from an assessment of the land deal involving Paul Lohnes, whom Crosby says he has known since the 1970s.

Caesars, though, claims that Crosby’s disclosures to Governor Deval Patrick and the state Ethics Commission had beenn’t enough. The Wynn proposal will have to compete directly against a Suffolk Downs plan for the only casino license in eastern Massachusetts, meaning that eliminating Caesars from the competition would assist the Everett proposition’s chances of gaining that permit.

The Caesars lawsuit also alleges that these were held to a different standard then various other casino operators who were bidding for licenses in the state. The suggestion that Caesars ultimately led to Suffolk Downs parting means with them as a casino partner, therefore the resulting confusion may have now been the determining factor in East Boston voters rejecting the casino plan.

Social Casino Index Shows Women Bet More Virtual Money than Men

Brand New data from the Social Casino Index shows American women bet more than men online, but just whenever it is play money.(Image: Getty)

Women in the U.S. bet 30 per cent more on online social casinos than men, which is astonishing news since typically males are linked more to gambling than ladies. Of course, they’re just wagering with Monopoly money, so it’s easier to bet large.

The interesting data was recently released by International Game tech (IGT), a world leader in gaming systems technology, and DoubleDown Casino, which is the greatest social casino in the world.

Social casino sites are categorized as people who are on offer via social networking sites and present players the opportunity to play non-wagering casino games including poker, roulette and slots. The first ever Social Casino Index released jointly by the 2 organizations has used the statistics from significantly more than six million people who play the DoubleDown Casino games on Facebook via their computer or mobile device each month.

Middle-Aged Ladies Lead the Play Money Pack

The data revealed that women are ahead of men in gaming activities and gambled more virtual chips each session, with those between your ages of 45 and 55 years of age being the main players. These women can be also more prone to bet big, as males appeared to not bet higher than 7.6 million chips that are virtual session, whereas women had been willing to increase to 10 million whenever they played.

‘As the planet’s largest social casino, we are always seeing to better understand our players and their preferences,’ explained the vice president of international marketing at IGT Interactive Group, John Clelland. ‘The personal Casino Index provides the gaming industry a really detailed indian dreaming pokie game free download check social casino player preferences for the first time. It’s also fascinating to appear to the similarities and huge difference in our players from shore to coast.’

For example, the personal Casino Index showed that more than 60 % of players in Nevada had been women.

Across America, those surviving in Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming had been more most likely to try out at social gambling enterprises, as these locations saw the highest concentration of players in the country.

Meanwhile, Hawaiians were found to be 20 percent more likely to try out on the move via mobile devices compared to the average off their states, and players from Maine had been discovered to be 25 percent less likely to want to play from a device that is mobile so obviously they would rather stay put while playing.

Gambling with Faux Chips

In the real-money gambling world, it is generally accepted that men make up nearly all the pool of those with bad gambling habits. Even Clelland stated that IGT had the ‘belief that men would make the highest bets.’ But since women are topping the chart on social casino internet sites, these statistics are going to raise issues among those whom see digital money gambling as a route to real-money gambling.

Even though the level has not yet been definitively measured, many have already claimed that games which simulate gambling can cause real-money that is problematic habits, specially in the younger generation who could become used to clicking away, seeing their numbers go up and down, without actually thinking about what they’re doing. The hope would be, of course, if they choose to try their luck on a real online casino that they make the distinction between virtual chips and real-money wagering.